ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE VERSUS TRADITIONAL THERAPIES FOR SMOKING CESSATION: AN OVERVIEW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53843/bms.v11i15.1094

Keywords:

Smoking Cessation, Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Vaping, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking is a significant cause of preventable deaths. This study compares the use of electronic cigarettes with traditional therapies for smoking cessation. The aim is to determine whether electronic cigarettes are safer and more effective than the conventional methods currently employed in smoking cessation treatments, considering their global public health impact. Methods: The study was guided by the PRISMA methodology adapted for an Overview, and the research question was developed using the PICO strategy. Articles were retrieved from the MEDLINE/PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and SCIELO databases, filtered according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and subsequently underwent data extraction. Results: The findings suggest that, while electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation compared to isolated therapies, combined therapies appear to be more effective. Moreover, electronic cigarettes are associated with a higher incidence of adverse events, and the statistical significance of their efficacy and safety is limited due to data dispersion. Discussion: The overview of systematic reviews on electronic cigarettes (EC) versus traditional therapies (TT) for smoking cessation (SC) revealed significant variability in methodologies and outcomes, complicating the ability to draw general conclusions. Nicotine-containing EC was more effective than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), counseling, and non-nicotine EC, but some TT, when combined or administered in flexible doses, were more cost-effective. The lack of regulation and the diversity of outcomes suggest that EC might not be the best intervention. Conclusion: Hence, the importance of analyzing the impact of EC use for SC is evident. However, the limitations in homogenizing the comparison of the collected studies restricted the generalization of an approach, highlighting data heterogeneity as the main obstacle to formulating solid guidelines. Therefore, the results underscore the need for protocol regulation and the importance of adhering to them for smoking cessation.

References

Araújo AJ de, Menezes AMB, Dórea AJPS, Torres BS, Viegas CA de A, Silva CAR da, et al. Diretrizes para Cessação do Tabagismo. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia [Internet]. 2004 Aug 1;30:S1–76. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132004000800002

Muakad IB. Tabagismo: maior causa evitável de morte do mundo. Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo [Internet]. 2014 Dec 6;109:527–58. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rfdusp/article/view/89244/96076

Cahill K, Stevens S, Perera R, Lancaster T. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews [Internet]. 2013;5(5):CD009329. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23728690

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29;372(71). Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a Critical Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews That Include Randomised or non-randomised Studies of Healthcare interventions, or Both. BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358(8122).

Santos CM da C, Pimenta CA de M, Nobre MRC. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2007Jun;15(3):508–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

Li J, Hui X, Fu J, Ahmed MM, Yao L, Yang K. Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2022 Oct 20;20(October):1–13.

Thomas KH, Dalili MN, López-López JA, Keeney E, Phillippo D, Munafò MR, et al. Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) [Internet]. 2021 Oct 1;25(59):1–224. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668482/

Ibrahim S, Habiballah M, Sayed IE. Efficacy of Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2020 Dec 17;089011712098028.

Chan GCK, Stjepanović D, Lim C, Sun T, Shanmuga Anandan A, Connor JP, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors. 2021 Mar;119:106912.

McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. McRobbie H, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012 Nov 14;

Lindson N, Theodoulou A, Livingstone-Banks J, Aveyard P, Fanshawe TR, Ordóñez-Mena JM, et al. Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 Mar 30;2022(3).

Pound CM, Zhang JZ, Kodua AT, Sampson M. Smoking cessation in individuals who use vaping as compared with traditional nicotine replacement therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 Feb;11(2):e044222. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e044222

Levett JY, Filion KB, P Reynier, Prell C, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy and Safety of E-Cigarette Use for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The American Journal of Medicine. 2023 May 1;136(8).

Thomas KH, Dalili MN, López‐López JA, Keeney E, Phillippo DM, Munafò MR, et al. Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Addiction. 2021 Oct 11;117(4).

Vanderkam P, Bonneau A, Kinouani S, Dzeraviashka P, Castera P, Besnier M, et al. Duration of the effectiveness of nicotine electronic cigarettes on smoking cessation and reduction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry [Internet]. 2022;13:915946. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35990084/

Quigley J, Walsh C, Lee C, Long J, Kennelly H, McCarthy A, et al. Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 2021 Nov 22;7(November):1–14.

Grabovac I, Oberndorfer M, Fischer J, Wiesinger W, Haider S, Dorner TE. Effectiveness of Electronic Cigarettes in Smoking Cessation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2020 Sep 17;23(4).

Wang RJ, Bhadriraju S, Glantz SA. E-Cigarette Use and Adult Cigarette Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;111(2):e1–17.

Heydari G, Masjedi M, Ahmady AE, Leischow SJ, Lando HA, Shadmehr MB, et al. A comparative study on tobacco cessation methods: a quantitative systematic review. International Journal of Preventive Medicine [Internet]. 2014 Jun 1;5(6):673–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25013685/

Published

12.05.2026

How to Cite

1.
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE VERSUS TRADITIONAL THERAPIES FOR SMOKING CESSATION: AN OVERVIEW. BMS [Internet]. 2026 May 12 [cited 2026 May 25];11(15). Available from: https://revistas.ifmsabrazil.org/bms/article/view/1094