Tempo Spatial Analysis of Mortality due to Gastric Cancer in the State of Paraná, between 2011 and 2021

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53843/bms.v11i15.1451

Keywords:

spatio-temporal analysis, epidemiology , stomach neoplasms

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer remains one of the neoplasms with the highest mortality rates in Brazil, particularly in states with wide socio-environmental diversity, such as Paraná. Its regional variations suggest the influence of socioeconomic factors, dietary habits, healthcare access, and population distribution, reinforcing the importance of spatiotemporal investigations. Methods: An ecological epidemiological study with spatial analysis of mortality from malignant gastric neoplasm (ICD C16) was conducted across municipalities in Paraná from 2011 to 2021. Mortality data were obtained from the Mortality Information System (SIM/DATASUS) and population estimates from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Crude and age-standardized mortality rates were calculated, and the epidemiological profile was assessed according to sex, age, race, marital status, and education level. Temporal trends were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression Program, while spatial analyses were performed in GeoDa with local empirical Bayesian smoothing and construction of thematic maps. Results: A total of 10,649 deaths were recorded during the study period. Most deaths occurred among males (66.2%), individuals aged 70–79 years (27.5%), Whites (77.2%), and those with 4 to 7 years of schooling (29.8%). The mean mortality rate was 8.66 per 100,000 inhabitants, peaking in 2015 (9.27/100,000) and reaching its lowest value in 2020 (7.73/100,000). Spatial analysis revealed significant clusters in the Centro Oriental, Norte Pioneiro, Sudoeste, and Noroeste regions. Discussion: The findings demonstrate persistent territorial inequalities, possibly related to disparities in healthcare access, prevalence of risk factors, and regional demographic characteristics. The identification of spatial clusters underscores the need for continuous surveillance and targeted public health policies. Conclusion: The study highlights priority areas for intervention within Paraná, contributing to the planning of prevention strategies, early diagnosis, and reduction of gastric cancer mortality.

References

1. Sexton RE, Al Hallak MN, Diab M, Azmi AS. Gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies. Cancer and Metastasis Rev. 2020 Sep 7;39(4):1179–203.

2. Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, Maciejewski R, Sitarz R. Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 4;21(11):4012.

3. Conti CB, Agnesi S, Scaravaglio M, Masseria P, Dinelli ME, Oldani M, et al. Early Gastric Cancer: Update on Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1;20(3):2149. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2149.

4. Pasechnikov V. Gastric cancer: Prevention, screening and early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(38):13842-62.

5. Necula L, Matei L, Dragu D, Neagu AI, Mambet C, Nedeianu S, et al. Recent advances in gastric cancer early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 7;25(17):2029–44.

6. Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F. Gastric Cancer: Descriptive Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Screening, and Prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev [Internet]. 2014 Mar 11;23(5):700–13. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/23/5/700/70292/Gastric-Cancer-Descriptive-Epidemiology-Risk.

7. Yang WJ, Zhao HP, Yu Y, Wang JH, Guo L, Liu JY, et al. Updates on global epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 28;29(16):2452–68.

8. Coelho LGV, Marinho JR, Genta R, Ribeiro LT, Passos M do CF, Zaterka S, et al. IVth Brazilian consensus conference on Helicobacter pylori infection. Arq Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2018 Apr 16;55(2):97–121. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032018000200097.

9. Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2006;12(3):354-62. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066052/.

10. Petrelli F, Berenato R, Turati L, Mennitto A, Steccanella F, Caporale M, et al. Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Feb;8(1):148–63.

11. Lee JH, Chang KK, Yoon C, Tang LH, Strong VE, Yoon SS. Lauren histologic type is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):105–13.

12. Qiu MZ, Shi SM, Chen M, Wang J, Wu QN, Sheng H, et al. Comparison of HER2 and Lauren classification between biopsy and surgical resection samples, primary and metastatic samples of gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2017;8(17):3531–7.

13. Pechey R, Monsivais P, Ng YL, Marteau TM. Why don’t poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption. Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:271–9.

14. Tsugane S. Salt, salted food intake, and risk of gastric cancer: Epidemiologic evidence. Cancer Sci. 2005 Jan 13;96(1):16.

15. Simões BDS, Barreto SM, Molina MDCB, Luft VC, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and socioeconomic position: a cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2018 Mar 5 [cited 2021 Dec 15];34(3):e00019717. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29513858/.

16. Ferreira M do C, Sarti FM, Barros MB de A. Social inequalities in the incidence, mortality, and survival of neoplasms in women from a municipality in Southeastern Brazil. Cad Saude Pública [Internet]. 2022 Mar 7;38(2):e00107521. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/GgyFsvVzpfYLQkBzpVnNrDq/?lang=en.

17. Fontana V, Decensi A, Orengo MA, Parodi S, Torrisi R, Puntoni R. Socioeconomic status and survival of gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Mar;34(4):537–42.

18. Roman A. A closer look into Brazil’s healthcare system: what can we learn? Cureus [Internet]. 2023 May 1;15(5). Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/152153-a-closer-look-into-brazils-healthcare-system-what-canwe-learn#.

19. Instituto Oncoguia. Estudo aponta impacto da covid-19 nos diagnósticos de câncer nos EUA [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.oncoguia.org.br/conteudo/estudo-aponta-impacto-da-covid19-nos-diagnosticos-de-cancer-noeua/16567/7/.

20. Hartt V. Onconews - Estudo mostra impacto da pandemia de COVID-19 na mortalidade por câncer no Brasil [Internet]. Onconews.com.br. 2024. Available from: https://www.onconews.com.br/site/noticias/ultimas/estudo-mostra-impacto-da-pandemia-de-covid-19-na-mortalidade-por-cancer-no-brasil.html.

21. Teh JL, Shabbir A, Yuen S, So JBY. Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 28;26(4):433–47.

22. Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS – Ministério da Saúde [Internet].Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; Available from:

https://datasus.saude.gov.br/.

Published

13.04.2026

How to Cite

1.
Tempo Spatial Analysis of Mortality due to Gastric Cancer in the State of Paraná, between 2011 and 2021. BMS [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 13 [cited 2026 Jun. 22];11(15). Available from: https://revistas.ifmsabrazil.org/bms/article/view/1451